UPDATE: Raw Milk Dumped At Capitol Protest
Save Email Print
UPDATE: Raw Milk Dumped At Capitol Protest
UPDATE: A state-appointed committee will soon consider whether raw milk should be sold in Wisconsin, and if so, under what conditions.
Reporter: Zac Schultz
Email Address: zschultz@nbc15.com
Font Size:

UPDATED Wednesday, January 13, 2010 --- 8:10 a.m.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- A state-appointed committee will soon consider whether raw milk should be sold in Wisconsin, and if so, under what conditions.

Secretary Rod Nilsestuen, of the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, says the group will consider the legal and regulatory affects and what conditions would be required to protect public health.

Wisconsin law has required since 1957 that milk sold to consumers be pasteurized.

The group's chair will be Richard Barrows, a retired Associate Dean of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The group also includes dairy farmers, cheese makers, consumers and food safety professionals.

The Legislature will be advised of the committee's recommendation. The group is expected to start meeting next month.

Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

__________________________________________________________

Posted Saturday, November 7, 2009 -- 1:30pm
By Zac Schultz

Madison: A local dairy farmer says the state is putting him out of business, so he's dumping his milk at the Capitol.

"My name is Scott Trautman and I'm a proud dairyman from the State of Wisconsin." Scott Trautman made a life change in 2003 when he decided to get into farming. Six years later he's says the state is trying to put him out of business. "I've been shut down."

Trautman says he's been milking organic jerseys for two years. He says the major milk producers won't pick up his product anymore, because they fear he's selling raw milk on the side, which is illegal.

He's had to dump his milk since October 16th, so Saturday he decided to dump it at the Capitol. "Less than an hour ago I was milking my beautiful cows at my farm, my healthy cows. There's nothing wrong with my milk. Nothing. Here's what happens when you take on food safety. You're ending up like this," says Scott as he dumped his milk. "My milk. Gone."

Trautman wants the legislature to legalize the sale of raw milk. Lawmakers at the Capitol aren't totally unsympathetic towards Scott's situation. But they say they're still concerned about safety. "I have farmer friends of mine that drink milk right off the farm that's unpasteurized, and there's no problem for them," says Rep. Gary Hebl (D-Sun Prairie). "But when you sell to the public there's a reason why milk is pasteurized, and that's for safety."

But Trautman says safety isn't an issue. It's legal for the farmer to drink, he just can't sell it. "Legal," says Scott, holding a glass of milk to his chest, "Illegal," he says while extending the glass towards a stranger. "Milk didn't change. What changed? Profit for the farmer. That's good organic jersey milk."

Scott Trautman says if it was legal he could sell organic raw milk for about $6 a gallon. He says it's a niche market that small dairy farmers like him could use to survive.


Latest Comments

Posted by: FDA Trumps State on Jan 13, 2010 at 02:29 PM

There is a big loop hole here. The farmers will just put labels on the bottles of raw milk they sell that say "Not for Human Use, For Feeding Pets and Animals Only". Then they can sell it to who ever wants to buy it, and once purchased those people can do what they want with it. This legislation is a waste of time and money because this loop hole is on the Federal level. (Milk sale is regulated by the FDA, key word "Federal"). This legislation is on the state level, so Federal trumps State.
Posted by: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM

Sure, why not? lets get the high blood pressure rate up a little more seeing the obesity rate has gone thru the roof. And thats what raw milk brings to the table High levels of saturated fat.
Posted by: Joe on Jan 13, 2010 at 09:56 AM

Can someone explain to me how this is different from smoking? Its well known that smoking kills peopls, and yet if someone wants to smoke they are free to do so. It is also known that raw milk has more bacteria in it then pasteurized milk and CAN be dangerous to consume. (Notice I say "can be" and not IS). But if someone wants to accept that risk and drink it, they should be free to do so with out the government stepping in and trying to control them. People in this county have the freedom of choice. If someone does or does not want to drink raw milk because of health concerns, they are free to do so. Isnt "freedom" why we are currently in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Weather Authority
Watch your local weather 24/7.
News Links
Looking for something you saw on NBC 15? Find it here.
Double Dollar Deals
Experience our area's best restaurants at a Half-Off price.
Golf Double Dollar Deals
Experience our area's best golf courses at a Half-Off price.
Family Double Dollar Deals
Experience our area's best businesses at a Half-Off price.
Perfect Home
Find out how to make your perfect home.
What's On?
Click here to see our program guide.
The Health Professional
Find answers to your health questions.
AP Video