NBC15 Poll
Is your company scaling down the holiday party?

Yes
No
We don't have one at all.


Woman Pushes For Smoking Ban Save Email Print
Reporter: Evrod Cassimy
Email Address: ECassimy@nbc15.com

A | A | A

A Stoughton woman is pushing her city to ban indoor smoking. But not because she's afraid of getting lung cancer, because she already battled the disease. Gayle Zinda says many people may think as long as they limit the amount of cigarettes they smoke they are in the clear from getting lung cancer. But for her it wasn't that easy.

"We always thought that if you quit smoking, my perception was, that your lungs regenerate after 5 or 7 or 10 years, you know and then you're all good," says Zinda.

Like many people, she was a social smoker in her early 20's, quitting before facing any serious health risks.

But almost 25 years after kicking the habit, doctors gave her a surprising diagnosis. "I never in a million years believed at the age, literally on my 50th birthday I find out I have lung cancer."

The cancer was detected early enough in Gayle's case, but for many the disease is fatal, taking the lives of Peter Jennings and Dana Reeve.

Gayle is now using her story as a reason to push for a statewide smoking ban in her city of Stoughton and the state of Wisconsin as a whole.

"There's so much research out there now that proves that the second hand stuff is no good that I felt that I just had to ask them. I just had to go before the Council."

And with the help of her son Adam, she's published a book called Pink Lemonade, and even embarked on a nationwide tour. She has taken her fight against lung cancer and hopes for a smoking ban nationwide.

"If people just knew what they were doing and quit being so stubborn," says Gayle's son Adam.

"I'm willing to do anything I can to help people not have people feel the way that I felt when I found out my mom had lung cancer at age 50." Gayle's hope is to prevent this disease from taking anymore lives.

But despite being a non-smoker, she finds the threat of second hand smoke is still there.

"I hope it doesn't take people forever to realize that this is something we've been talking about for many many years and it's time to quit talking and act on it."

For more on Gayle's story you can visit her website at www.lemonmotivators.com

The city of Stoughton approved her idea for a statewide smoking ban Tuesday night in a 6 to 2 vote. That statewide ban has been introduced into the legislature, but it is unlikely to see any debate until the state budget is finished.

More Stories
Report: Man With Ties to Madison Killed in Mumbai

One Dead, Four Injured in Two-Car Crash

More Snow Predicted for Wednesday

Winter Storm: Update from the City of Madison

Winter Storm Warning: Report from Emergency Operations

Andy North: Clipping Cancer

Thanksgiving Weekend OWI Arrests

CrimeTracker 15: Two BB Gun Incidents: One Injured

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Customer on Aug 22, 2007 at 03:23 PM
I have no issue with anyone operating a private business where the owner chooses to maintain a smoke free environment, or with customers that want to frequent smoke free businesses, or with employees that want to work only in smoke free businesses. I do have an issue with government demanding that all businesses be smoke free. If I, as a private business owner, I want to allow smoking in my place of business, that should be my prerogative. If you, as a customer, do not wish to be around smoke in a business, then you are free to go to any other business that offers a smoke free atmosphere. If you, as a potential employee, wish to work in a smoke free environment, then you should apply to work at a smoke free business. If a customer or employee wishes to smoke in my private business, and I allow smoking, then we have a natural supply and demand equation. If there are not enough customers to support my private business - then I will not be able to afford to keep my business open, and my business will cease to exist. Smoking allowed or not allowed. Capitalism. Freedom of choice in the business I select to utilize or seek employment from. If there are no businesses in the area that are smoke free, the answer lies in some resourceful individual opening & operating such a business. The answer does not lie in governments forcing private businesses to become smoke free.

Posted by: Smoker on Aug 20, 2007 at 03:26 PM
Let's see - I car pool, or use non-motorized transporation. I grow my own food for the most part, and am in excelent physical shape. Obese people cause MY health insurance to go up, the costs to MY employer to be higher due to THEIR cronic illness and injuries. That is how YOU leave YOUR residue in MY world.

Posted by: anti smoker on Aug 20, 2007 at 01:12 PM
dear smoker.. your habit polluted MY air. when obese people start leaving the residue of their bad habit in my hair and lungs, I'll complain about them too. your bad habit is not only hurting you - it hurts my five year old with asthma, my 65 year old mother with COPD and my husband with chronic lung problems from his past work as an insulation installer. You selfishly impose that poison on us and you have no right to do so

Posted by: Smoker Location: Columbia County on Aug 17, 2007 at 03:31 PM
I would say that obesity is causing more of a "public burden" than smoking is. So are we going to start banning over weight people from eating in public? Force them to eat outside maybe? Publicly humiliate them? Oh yeah, that is only for those of us who smoke.

Posted by: Smoker Location: Grant Co on Aug 16, 2007 at 12:50 PM
That's right ban smoking everywhere..get everyone to quit smoking! Great plan. Save lives. Oh..wait...where will the state get all the tax dollars from then if nobody smokes?Will all you evil do gooders step up to pick up the tab?? I sincerely doubt it. Would you like to pay more sales tax? How about make you pay more property tax? How about take from the schools? Roads? Maybe with the new drinking laws everyone will stop drinking too. Just think how much the state would hurt for tax dollars if nobody smoke or drank? AND then what?

AP Video