May 25, 2013

Weather

Mostly Cloudy

58°
Feels Like: 58 °
Conditions at Madison, Dane County Regional-Truax Field, WI
Save Email Print Bookmark and Share
A A

Madison Woman Sentenced For Stealing Over $100,000 In Federal Retirement Funds

Posted Tuesday, April 10, 2012 --- 3:10 p.m.

From the Department of Justice:

Madison, Wis. - John W. Vaudreuil, United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, announced that Joyce Weise, 63, Madison, was sentenced today by U.S. District Judge William Conley to one year and one day in jail for conversion of government retirement funds.

Weise pleaded guilty to this charge on January 26, 2012.

Between September 1995 and November 2009, Ms. Weise kept and then spent retirement pension funds that were for her mother, Ann Weise, who had passed away on September 20, 1995.

In March 2011, during the course of a routine audit, the Retirement Inspection Branch of the Office of Personnel Management noticed that retirement benefits were still being disbursed to Ann Weise. Her social security number was cross-checked with Social Security records and showed that Ann Weise died in 1995.

At sentencing, Chief Judge Conley noted that the defendant's conduct resulted in a loss to the government of $131,878.21 and thus called for a prison term to deter others from attempting the same scheme in the future.

Weise was also ordered to pay restitution to the United States of the total amount she stole.

The charges against the defendant were the result of an investigation conducted by Office of the Inspector General, Office of Personnel Management and the U.S. Secret Service. The prosecution of the case has been handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul W. Connell.


Comments (11)

By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Paul Location: Alexandria on Apr 12, 2012 at 06:18 AM
    Her actions were surely criminal and I think she should be working more at restitution than costing us more to keep her locked up. But let's hear it for those excessive government pensions, which in her case amounted to less than $13,000 a year.
  • by Bobbie Location: Dane County on Apr 11, 2012 at 03:19 PM
    Let's be practical. People would rather see her locked up at tax payers' expense than out working and paying restitution??? Rather pay for their "pound of flesh" (it is expensive to keep someone in prison) than have her pay back the feds? At 63, she doesn't have a lot of working years left to earn restitution - you want her to spend them in prison being supported by taxpayers??? How senseless!
    • reply
      by WIBadger on Apr 12, 2012 at 11:51 AM in reply to Bobbie
      I'd rather see this type of person die and rot in prison, even if it costs me some money. Heck, our govt wastes money on less "productive" things, so I don't see anything wrong with letting her die in prison. The judge's message is if you're "old," it may be worth the risk of stealing (ie, crime). This is wrong. It should be if you do the crime, you do the time. Have you ever heard of a guy named Bernie Madoff? I suppose if you were the judge for Bernie, you'd hit him with a short sentence. Now that would be senseless!!! This 63yr old charlatan beat the feds twice, and I hope she sends a big "thank you" note to the judge.
  • by Randy on Apr 11, 2012 at 02:09 PM
    Dead people are an issue. You hear stories where someone died 3 years ago and no one reported it. And when does the government start investigating? When their 131st birthday comes around and they are still sending checks out to this person?
  • by Linda Location: MT on Apr 11, 2012 at 08:51 AM
    She should have definately gotten more than one year and not only should she have to pay it back, she should have to pay it back with interest!
  • by Laurie Location: Baltimore, MD on Apr 11, 2012 at 08:22 AM
    The woman died in 1995, and it wasn't caught until a 2011 audit. Why wasn't there an audit sooner? I would think there'd be an audit at least ever ten years.
  • by Alan on Apr 11, 2012 at 07:10 AM
    She's 63; you'd rather she die in prison?
  • by June Location: Madison on Apr 10, 2012 at 05:08 PM
    Well it only took the federal government 6 years to figure out that checks issued to a dead woman were being cashed. 6 years??? Nice accounting system...
    • reply
      by meme on Apr 11, 2012 at 03:00 PM in reply to June
      6 years? September 1995 to January 2012 is 16-1/2 years, if it was only 6 she wouldn't owe so much. In fact audits of retirement funds should be conducted routinely maybe it would stop the thieves.
  • by Anonymous on Apr 10, 2012 at 03:50 PM
    She only received 1 yeaR? That's crazy!
    • reply
      by Anonymous on Apr 11, 2012 at 07:28 AM in reply to
      If it was anyone else, they would have thrown the key away on us. I am wondering as to who paid who off for such a crazy sentence.

NBC15 News Videos

Watch your local weather, 24/7.
Follow Project Money and see people's lives change forever.
Experience our area's best restaurants at a Half-Off price.
Experience our area's best golf courses at a Half-Off price.
Find answers to your health questions.
Get advice from the experts at SVA Plumb Financial.
Take a look at what local businesses can do for you!
Nominate Your Favorite Teacher Today! Click Here to Download Form & More Information!