UPDATE: Trial In Voter ID Lawsuit

UPDATED Thursday, April 19, 2012 --- 12:30 p.m.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- A challenge to Wisconsin's new voter ID law won't be resolved before this spring's recalls are over.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and immigrant advocacy group Voces de la Frontera filed a lawsuit in Madison in December alleging the ID requirements create an unreasonable burden on voters. State attorneys have countered few people lack identification and concerns about obtaining IDs are overblown.

Dane County Circuit Judge David Flanagan has temporarily blocked the law from taking effect while he considers both sides' arguments. A four-day bench trial wrapped up early Thursday afternoon with Flanagan saying he wants to see both sides' final positions in writing.

He says final briefs will be due June 18, nearly two weeks after the June 5 general recall election.

Copyright 2012. The Associated Press.

___________________________________________________

UPDATED Thursday, April 19, 2012 --- 9:15 a.m.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Closing arguments are expected soon in a court case challenging Wisconsin's voter photo ID law.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and immigrant advocacy group Voces de la Frontera filed a lawsuit in Madison in December alleging the ID requirements create an unreasonable burden on voters. State attorneys have countered few people lack identification and concerns about obtaining IDs are overblown.

Dane County Circuit Judge David Flanagan has issued a temporary injunction blocking the law from taking effect. He's been hearing arguments in the case since Monday. Both sides were expected to make their closing arguments sometime Thursday.

Another Dane County judge has issued a permanent injunction blocking the law in a separate challenge brought by the League of Women Voters. The state has appealed that ruling.

Copyright 2012. The Associated Press.

___________________________________________________

UPDATED Monday, April 16, 2012 --- 10:40 a.m.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- An attorney challenging Wisconsin's law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls calls that an "onerous and unreasonable burden" during opening statements.

A trial began Monday in the lawsuit challenging the law brought by the Milwaukee chapter of the NAACP and Voces de la Frontera, an immigrants' rights group.

NAACP attorney Richard Saks says testimony will show there are hundreds of thousands of voters who don't have the required ID necessary to vote.

But Assistant Attorney General Carrie Benedon says the number is far less and the burden placed on voters isn't nearly as large or widespread as alleged.

Dane County Circuit Judge David Flanagan last month issued a temporary injunction blocking the law from taking effect pending the trial.

Copyright 2012. The Associated Press.

___________________________________________________

Posted Monday, April 16, 2012 --- 8:15 a.m.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- A trial is set to begin in a case challenging Wisconsin's law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls, even as the state Supreme Court considers whether to take the case.

Dane County Circuit Judge David Flanagan last month issued a temporary injunction blocking the law from taking effect. A second judge issued a permanent injunction, and both decisions were appealed.

The state appeals court on March 28 asked the Supreme Court to take up the issue, saying speed was important given pending elections.

But the Supreme Court has not said it will take the cases. That means the trial starting Monday in one of the two lawsuits is proceeding.

That case was brought by the NAACP's Milwaukee branch and Voces de la Frontera, an immigrants' rights group.

Copyright 2012. The Associated Press.


Comments (12)

By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by GETTINGTIRED Location: Wi on Apr 21, 2012 at 07:19 AM
    No VOTER SUPPRESSION............ LOVE IT
  • by Adam Location: Madison on Apr 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM
    And as soon as these injunctions are cleared the Federal govt. will step in to halt it... and so on and so on... This sure is giving a lot of lawyers a lot of money.
  • by Anonymous on Apr 19, 2012 at 11:04 AM
    Too bad Walker had to sign this silly law in. Anyone who wants to commit voter fraud can still do so, with a fake photo ID.
  • by Gettingtired Location: wi on Apr 19, 2012 at 09:56 AM
    Too many people fought for the right to vote.....the only reason they. Tried to stops folks from..voting ....majority of folks they are trying g to suppress are not. Voting for them.
  • by J.C. on Apr 16, 2012 at 12:07 PM
    So an immigrants rights group starteed this whole thing?? My question then is how many of these immigrants are here legally??? If they are not legal the issue of their vote should be null and void. And then they should be deported.
  • by ThumbsUp Location: Madison on Apr 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM
    NoMoreExcuses, you are ABSOLUTELY right! Love the comment. It's ridiculous that we're wasting court time on something that should be common sense. Welcome to the insanity of WI.
  • by NoMoreExcuses on Apr 16, 2012 at 08:29 AM
    Hold the phone! Did I just see that the Federal Govt will no longer issue paper social security checks? Rather the (previoulsy disenfranchised) elderly will now have to have a bank to direct deposit the check into or receive a debit card? Aren't they going to need a photo ID to open that bank account or use that debit card? Whoops there goes THAT argument about photo ID! They're going to need one to use their SS benefits, why not use that same ID to vote?
    • reply
      by NoMoreVoterSuppression on Apr 17, 2012 at 08:50 AM in reply to NoMoreExcuses
      So apparently in your world no Social Security recipients currently have bank accounts, and everyone everywhere is always required to present photo ID when using a debit card. Where exactly do you live again?
      • reply
        by Gettingtired on Apr 19, 2012 at 09:57 AM in reply to NoMoreVoterSuppression
        No. Voter id
      • reply
        by NoMoreExcuses on Apr 19, 2012 at 11:09 AM in reply to NoMoreVoterSuppression
        Where did you read that I stated no SS recipients currently had bank accounts? If they have them, I can almost guarantee they've already used an ID to maintain that account. And any reputable retailer will ask someone using a credit or debit card for a photo ID as well. I'm still not seeing your voter suppression here?? And JC has a great point - the one's opposing this are immigrant groups - they SHOULD have to carry a photo ID at all times to prove they are legal.
      • reply
        by Tom on Apr 19, 2012 at 12:45 PM in reply to NoMoreVoterSuppression
        In today's world you need a photo ID for most everything. I cannot see how someone can argue that you should not have to prove who you are to vote. Without integrity in the voting process we do not have a legitimate democracy. How many countless studies and examples need to be brought forward demonstrating that voter fraud happens at every election. This supported by both parites. If you are fighting this bill you are fighting in support of voter fraud PERIOD! There are free services available to gain a photo ID that will enable someone to vote, so the argument that this bill discriminates against the poor is BS!
        • reply
          by T on Apr 20, 2012 at 12:47 PM in reply to Tom
          Tom, anyone with multiple fake photo ID's can vote in more than one place.

Gray Television, Inc. - Copyright © 2002-2013

Designed by Gray Digital Media