Autism Compromise? Save Email Print
Reporter: Zac Schultz
Email Address: zschultz@nbc15.com

A | A | A

Posted Thursday --- February 28, 2008 --- 6:00pm

Madison: Children with autism can easily be overstimulated by loud noises, a lot of action and new environments.

So you know these parents mean business when they brought their kids to the Capitol for a rally to demand the Assembly vote on a bill that would require insurance companies cover autism treatment.

The Senate passed the bill last week, and Governor Doyle says it's a simple choice. "It's whether you're going to side with some insurance companies in the state of Wisconsin, or whether you're going to side with families that really need some help."

The Assembly was in session one floor up from the rally, and parent Terry Recker was hoping they could hear. "I hope we can show them this is something their constituents are for."

Terry and her husband have two children with autism, but their health insurance won't cover treatment. That treatment can cost $40-60,000 a year. A state program can provide treatment, but there's a waiting list 300 families long. "Our son Jonnie, he's on the waiting list. His wait, we've been told could be up to two years. They stress early intervention, but you get the early diagnosis and you can't afford the treatment. Then what are you supposed to do?"

Rep. Mike Huebsch (R-West Salem) is the Assembly Speaker.
He says the autism bill is not being ignored. "We are going to be addressing the autism matter in the Assembly very soon, if not today."

But Huebsch and many other Republicans oppose the mandate on insurance companies. He says that would actually increase state costs by $9 million. Instead, he'd like to spend $6 million to expand the state program and eliminate the waiting list. "We would achieve the same thing without putting an $80 million increase on insurances across the state."

But autism advocates like Lynn Meshke say that's not enough. "Extra money to go into the children's waiver, while very much appreciated, won't help all of the individuals who are aged out of the waiver, or who are adults."

More Stories
Exercise Guidelines: Get Moving!

Candy Contamination?

Lowering SIDS Risk

Colon Cancer Fight

Microwave Health Dangers

Warning: Cold Medicines

Sagging Facelifts: Sign of Times

FDA: Melamine Decision

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Lynda Location: Milton,Wi on Jul 1, 2008 at 12:49 PM
This is only a start with what needs to be done, once progress is made and a child is in the school programs, parents should feel confident that even if an IEP is not present because the services aren't needed, that the teachers, staff and administration are qualified and knowledgable to teach the child the way they need to be taught. Parents should never have to hear the school say "this is age appropriate and I see it in boys all the time." Also, companies that supply resources for teachers and parents need to be much more sensative in the prices they charge. I can't afford to pay 300.00 for a conference, I have to replace broken items in my house from the behavioral problems that are associated with autism.I can't afford to stay home with my child to give him more guidance and "social education" the schools don't teach that. These are the kids that will have be pinned for bad behavior, and will cost us more in the future. Not all autistic kids can be medicated. Thanks for your time.

Posted by: D Location: Madison on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:13 AM
This is very sad about Insurance Cos pulling this esp when they are paid such premiums and yet want to get by as cheap as they can, Its sad its not about a persons health anymore if anything its all about money, makes me kinda glad i dont have health insurance, its a waste of money in my opinion

Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 29, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Treatment for Autism should be covered by existing and future health insurance. This just demonstrates the games that health insurance companies are allowed to play with the people that they say they insure. Insurance is worthless if it does not pay when you need it. In this society, families should not be still going bankrupt to cover treatment for their children. The parents have health insurance, it is just that the health insurance sucks. If it were covered, the hospitals would find it profitable, would invite more patients, would generate more research dollars, and there would be fewer cases of Autism and everyone would gain from it. Perhaps we could sell the technology to the Chinese to pay back some of the debt we own them!

Posted by: Amy Location: Madison on Feb 29, 2008 at 08:01 AM
Please, when you are on the air say "children with autism" not "autistic children". It is quite politically incorrect. Person first language is used in the DD field. Thanks!